There are no indexes in Netezza. This is an intentional design choice. Indexes are effective in an OLTP system, where transactions affect a single row or two, but not in an OLAP system, where transactions affect large sets of data. Netezza is designed to be a fully OLAP-focused system, in both hardware and software, and indexes did not meet that goal. (more…)
Inside Netezza are specialized processing units called SPUs, which have their own sets of disks, each containing a portion of your data. The SPUs work in parallel to return the answer you need. But if one of them has more data than the others, then we will be waiting on just that one to finish while the others are already done and sitting idle. The workload is unbalanced because the data is skewed. To conquer big data, we need to divide work evenly. (more…)
In any database, whether it’s SQL Server, Oracle, Sybase, DB2, Access (does Access count?), or anything else, the primary bottleneck is disk IO. Even if you have an SSD, the disk is the slowest part. In those databases we use indexes to alleviate this. Their query engine uses the index to find exactly where on the disk to start and stop reading, which keeps it from scanning entire tables to find every answer.
Netezza has an entirely different solution to the IO problem (in fact, it has no indexes). It cuts the cost of disk reads by doing the work in parallel. Simply put, it’s a brute force solution to the problem using specialized hardware, but that’s just the start. (more…)